Thursday, March 26, 2009

Weighted RPS

Weighted Rock/Paper/Scissors is the sort of mechanic Dave Sirlin loves, and that I've been thinking about using in an RPG since reading his Yomi concept years ago.

Essentially a trumping circle like RPS becomes interesting when you have a stronger incentive to use one move over another.  If we play RPS for money, and I get $15 if I win with rock, $10 if I win with paper, and $5 if I win with scissors, there's instant depth.  You know that I want to win with rock, so paper seems like a good strategy.  But I know that, so throwing scissors for a lesser win is improved, which in turn you know etc etc.  

Time has repeatedly proved I'm too lazy to actually write an RPG, however.  So I'll describe what it might look like:


You play one character, who has three scores for conflict, rated at 3, 6 and 9, in an RPS relationship.  Let's say Finesse beats Power which beats Subterfuge which beats Finesse.

You have a number of hit points (let's say 20), when you've lost them all you can't contributed to the conflict anymore.

Your team has HP for the conflict (just like Disposition in Burning X), which is by default half the team's total HP (so 40 for a four player group).  When it's all gone, you've lost the conflict, you don't get what you wanted, and the enemy does.  You can bid up the difficulty of the conflict by spending conflict HP, which allows you to get more for winning (eg "We hate these guys, we want them out of the game for good, we're spending 20 HP to kill them all and destroy their empire if we win").

The conflict is turn based, each character (PC and NPC) in turn picks an opponent to contest with.  You choose Finesse, Power or Subterfuge simultaneously, with a draw retested, but you DO know your opponent's rating in each before choosing.  If you win, your opponent loses both personal and conflict (team) HP equal to your rating.   If they win, you lose according to their rating - no safe attacks!

(OMG you don't have to kill everyone to win the conflict!)

Wrinkles are:

- It's level based, and higher levels get you abilities to use to modify attacks.  These have a cooldown (by default one turn, probably they are cards and you tap them).  If they modify ratings they must be used BEFORE throwing RPS (and no character can ever have two equal ratings from any combination of effects).  You will probably see things like "+3 Finesse for this attack", "Use when you have won an attack, do +3 conflict damage but no personal damage", "If you win, lock your opponent's two rightmost abilities for two turns".

Ideally characters should know more abilities than they can actually use, allowing a big PC problem space to master, but NPCs to be competitive with a minimal working set (amongst other benefits).

-  There will be an Exalted-style stunt mechanic, possibly giving personal HP, untaps.

-  There really should be mechanical conditions on the battlefield relevant to the objectives, which can be neutralised or flipped by character action.  Hopefully making things feel less abstract without unnecessary detail (eg "You're fighting inside the senate chamber!  Whoever currently has the favour of the senators does an extra point of conflict damage on a successful attack.  Your foes start with their favour.")  That implies a quick resolution system that's probably needed anyway but doesn't fit :(


The way I'd probably do it is seperate combat and non-combat conflicts, with each character having different ratings for both (but equal...9/6/3 in each field).  Certain powers would allow crossover between realms of conflict.

It certainly needs work, and probably mecha.  I'm not sure if I'll maintain enough interest to apply either...

Monday, March 23, 2009

Anything can be theorycrafted

The Elitist Jerks benefactor's forum has a venerable but lively style thread, where a sartorial master holds court. Crumpled gamer nerds are honed into competent dressers. The hottest sales are heralded with all the import of class nerfs and buffs.

Raiders care about quality. The overlap of budgets and sales is sufficiently random to leverage the same skills that maximise DPS from random loot tables. Naturally they eat it up; even I feel compelled to shop for shoes. Pity I don't have trivial access to Manhattan >_<

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Learning to Fight

I am climbing the viciously steep wall between my abysmal execution skills and actually getting to play Street Fighter IV.

Most games I play are very easy - in particular rpgs, where skilled or knowledgeable play actively makes the game easier by giving you a more powerful playing piece. Other games have poor incentives to do things the hard way, and I've never found making my own arbitrary challenges compelling. I don't really PVP.

Hence, my skills are flabby.

SFIV is a compelling case for trying to fix that - the learning curve starts out fairly brutal, but it's long - all that improvement goes somewhere, it has utility. It's a very pure form of PVP with a huge and vibrant community. Their jargon has the seductive note of depth, their champions are awe-inspiring (Daigo "The Beast" Umehara's epic parry comeback belongs amongst the great competitive sporting moments). Becoming mediocre at this game is a worthy goal, and has a lot of gaming cultural currency :)

So while I wait for my Hori stick to arrive, dreaming of playing Rose or Sakura with finesse online, I throw Ryu's fireballs at the lowest breed of AIs, hoping to hit seven in ten. And when I fire up a PSP or DS game, I reach for the hardest difficulty, hoping to shed a little flab.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Less is More

Amusingly enough, the more successful I am in WoW (via my guild), the less time I need to put in.

In tBC, as part of a very casual guild, I felt like I needed to work constantly to maintain my raiding edge, farming heroics for badges, having stockpiles of gold in case raid drop crafting recipes hit the AH.

In WotLK, I'm part of a medium-core raiding guild, and I don't really feel I need to play at all outside raids. My gold stockpile from levelling alts isn't depleted, a little AH and rep action is good enough to get alts into Naxxramas, and once you're in there with a competent raid the gear flows freely. My paladin alt has done maybe three or four heroics, but can MT Naxx-10 and competently OT Naxx-25.

Ulduar will be more difficult, but the ramp in will still be highly accessible raiding, more so as we crush Naxx with our ilevel 226+ geared mains for the benefit of alts. Eventually I'll be obliged to make some more money, but even with flask and repair costs relatively little effort translates into a LOT of raiding these days. I can keep my shaman at the top of her game while staying current with console gaming, and it's very nice indeed :)